Public register · Edition 2026.08 · Exclusions · Last verified: 4 August 2026

Not listed: the exclusions, stated as criteria

Thirty-three projects met the inclusion rule out of the 5,435 registered in Ahmedabad district and the 719 in Bhavnagar district, both lists read in full on 4 August 2026. Absence from this register means one criterion was not met, and this page states which. Absence is not a finding, a warning, or a comment on any company.

§01

The rule this page follows

A ranking that names who is in has an obligation to say who is out and why, in terms that can be checked. The only permitted form of exclusion on this site is "did not meet criterion X". No negative characterisation of any real company is published here, in any form, and none will be. If a promoter believes an exclusion is wrong, the correction route is corrections@dholera-realestate.com.

§02

The four exclusion criteria

Exclusion criteria applied to the GujRERA lists read on 4 August 2026
Criterion not metHow manyWhat the criterion meansSource checked
No Dholera or DSIRDA evidence on the GujRERA record5,402 of the 5,435 registered projects in Ahmedabad districtThe project's own GujRERA record does not carry Dholera in its registration number, does not name DSIRDA or the Dholera Special Investment Region Development Authority as approving authority, does not give a DSIRDA boundary village as its moje, and does not contain the string DHOLERA in its registered name or address.GujRERA Ahmedabad district project list
Registered outside Ahmedabad district719 projects in Bhavnagar districtBhavnagar borders the Dholera Special Investment Region. Its full registered project list was pulled and checked, and it returned zero Dholera or DSIRDA matches, so no project was excluded for being in the wrong district by mistake.GujRERA Bhavnagar district project list
Not registered with GujRERA, or registration purgedCount unknownA project that was never registered cannot appear on a register of registrations, and GujRERA publishes no district-keyed list of lapsed or deregistered projects, so this site cannot count how many that is. The gap is stated rather than filled.Declared gap in the dataset
Promoter holds no Dholera registrationEvery promoter name not among the 22A company marketing in Dholera that holds no GujRERA-registered project carrying Dholera evidence in Ahmedabad district on 4 August 2026 is absent from the developer views. This is a statement about the register on that date and nothing else.GujRERA Ahmedabad district project list
Counts are of records in the government lists on the date read. The Ahmedabad list returned 5,435 projects and the Bhavnagar list 719.

Source: GujRERA Ahmedabad district list, 5,435 records · Source: GujRERA Bhavnagar district list, 719 records · Read 4 August 2026 · Status: OFFICIAL

§03

A worked exclusion

One excluded record is published in full so the criterion can be seen operating rather than asserted.

Worked example of an excluded record
FieldValue on the GujRERA record
Project nameJP RESIDENCY
GujRERA project id7591
RERA registration numberPR/GJ/AHMEDABAD/DHANDHUKA/Dhandhuka Municipality/RAA04970/A1R/EX1/311224/290625
Village, the moje fieldDhandhuka
Sub districtDhandhuka
Approving authorityDhandhuka Municipality
AddressSurvey No. 315/1+2P1, 315/2, Moje: Dhandhuka,
Criterion not metNo Dholera/DSIRDA evidence on the GujRERA record
Source: GujRERA Ahmedabad district project list and per-project detail, read 4 August 2026. This record is registered in Dhandhuka municipality, which is a different approving authority from DSIRDA.
§04

Included but marked unconfirmed

Three records sit at the boundary of the inclusion rule. Their GujRERA record cites a Dholera Special Investment Region town planning scheme in a Dhandhuka taluka address, but never says Dholera and names no DSIRDA village. They are included and stamped INFERRED rather than quietly dropped or quietly promoted, and their evidence is printed on their entry pages.

  • PLATINUM 7, 7 OAK DEVELOPERS. Evidence: Dholera SIR town-planning scheme cited in address: 'TP 1-A2 NR 250' (taluka DHANDHUKA); NOT independently stated as Dholera on the record
  • PLATINUM 9, 7 OAK DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED. Evidence: Dholera SIR town-planning scheme cited in address: 'TP 2B-1 NR EX' (taluka DHANDHUKA); NOT independently stated as Dholera on the record
  • AAIJI RESIDENCY, AAIJI INFRA AND DEVELOPERS. Evidence: Dholera SIR town-planning scheme cited in address: 'TP 2B1)' (taluka DHANDHUKA); NOT independently stated as Dholera on the record
§05

What this page will never say

It will never say a company is unreliable, risky, best avoided, or any equivalent. It will never rank a company on reputation, on reviews, or on anything that is not a field in a government record. Where the register holds no information about a company, this site publishes that it holds no information, which is a different statement from a negative one and is the only one the evidence supports.